Commons:Kandydatury do grafik na medal

Prezentacja grafik kandydatów w innych językach:

Shortcut: COM:FPC Na tej stronie prezentowani są kandydaci do wyróżnionych grafik (na polskiej Wikipedii "Grafika na medal"). Zwróć uwagę, że nie jest to samo co Grafika dnia, która jest inną forma wyróżnienia.

Aby obejrzeć archiwum poprzednio nominowanych grafik, przejdź na stronę: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.

Istnieje także chronologiczna lista wyróżnionych grafik. Zobacz także: Kandydatów do grafik wysokiej jakości oraz Okiem fotografów.

Formalności

Nominacja

Jeżeli uważasz, że znalazłeś/aś zdjęcie lub stworzyłeś/aś grafikę, która może być uważana jako wartościowa, z odpowiednim opisem i licencją, skopiuj nazwę grafiki w to pole (zawierającą prefiks File:), po tym jak tekst będzie już w polu:

Potem musisz ręcznie wprowadzić link do stworzonej strony na górze Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Głosowanie

Aby wyrazić swoje poparcie, możesz użyć następujących szablonów:

{{Support}} ( Support),

lub aby wyrazić swoją dezaprobatę:

{{Oppose}} ( Oppose),

Możesz także użyć:

Neutralny: {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
Komentarz: {{Comment}} ( Comment),
Informacja: {{Info}} ( Info).
Pytanie: {{Question}} ( Question),
Prośba: {{Request}} ( Request).

Proszę, postaraj się napisać kilka słów, dlaczego podoba Ci się (lub nie podoba) dane zdjęcie - szczególnie, gdy głosujesz przeciw. Pamiętaj również, aby złożyć swój podpis (~~~~).

Zasady prezentacji grafik kandydatów

Zasady główne

Po zakończeniu okresu głosowania wynik będzie ogłoszony 15. dnia po nominacji (tak jak jest to pokazane w tabelce czasowej poniżej). A więc okres głosowania to dwa tygodnie (plus godziny do końca 14. dnia). Głosy dodane 15. dnia i później nie są liczone.
Nominacje zgłaszane przez anonimowych uczestników są mile widziane.
Wkład do dyskusji przez anonimowych uczestników jest również mile widziany.
Głosy oddane przez anonimowych uczestników nie są liczone.
Nominacje nie liczą się jako głosy. Poparcie musi być wyraźnie określone.
Nominowani mogą wycofać swoje nominowane zdjęcia w każdej chwili - pisząc: "I withdraw my nomination" lub dodając tekst {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
Pamiętaj, że celem projektu Wikimedia Commons jest zapewnienie centralnego repozytorium dla grafik używanych przez wszystkie projekty Wikimedia, łącznie z możliwymi przyszłymi projektami. To nie jest po prostu depozyt dla grafik Wikipedii, więc grafiki nie powinny być tutaj oceniane na podstawie ich przydatności dla tego projektu.
Zdjęcia mogą być usuwane z listy, jeżeli nie mają żadnego poparcia (nie licząc nominujących) w 5. dniu (dzień nominacji + 5).
Zdjęcie oznaczone szablonem {{FPX}} może zostać usunięte z listy po 24 godzinach od zastosowania tego znacznika, pod warunkiem że nie ma ono głosów popierających poza nominującym.

Zasady publikacji grafik

Grafika kandydata zostanie umieszczona, jeżeli będzie spełniać następujące warunki:

Odpowiednia licencja (co jest oczywiste)
Grafika musi mieć przynajmniej 7 głosów poparcia
Podział głosów popierających/przeciwnych musi mieścić się przynajmniej w stosunku 2/1 (większość dwóch - trzecich)
Nie mogą być wybrane dwie różne wersje tej samej grafiki - wybrana zostanie wersja z większą liczbą oddanych głosów.

Zobacz jak postępować ze starymi nominacjami: Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#Co zrobić kiedy głosowanie się zakończy.

Usuwanie zdjęć prezentowanych kandydatów

Nadgodzinowa zamiana standardów zamieszczonej grafiki. Może się tak zdarzyć, że dla niektórych grafik formalne wystarczająco dobre nie jest już aktualne. To jest dla listy zdjęć, które wierzysz, że nie zasługują dłużej by być prezentowaną grafiką. To wymaga 2/3 głosów większości (i minimum 5 głosów) zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy prezentowanych zdjęć. Jeżeli nie ma 2/3 głosów zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy, nominacja zostaje jako prezentowana grafika. Dla nich głosuj "Zachowaj" Keep (to zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką) lub "Usuń z listy" Delist (to nie zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką). Proszę zapewnij link do oryginalnej FP nominacji (to pojawi się pod Links na stronie opisu grafiki). Inaczej te same zasady jak te powyżej wchodzą w życie. Proszę użyj tego linku this link aby dodać nowego możliwego do usunięcia kandydata.

Wskazówki dla nominujących

Poniżej możesz znaleźć niektóre ”informacje” na temat zasad, które zdjęcia powinny spełniać:

Rozdzielczość – Grafiki zlokalizowane na Commons mogą być używane nie tylko do oglądania na ekranie. Mogą zostać również użyte do drukowania lub oglądania na monitorach o bardzo wysokiej rozdzielczości. Nie możemy także przewidzieć, jakie urządzenia zostaną użyte w przyszłości, a więc ważne jest, aby zdjęcia, które są nominowane, miały tak dużą rozdzielczość jak tylko jest to możliwe. Rozdzielczość powinna być przynajmniej na poziomie 2 mln pikseli (np. 2000x1000), co wydaje się rozsądne na obecną chwilę.
Ostrość – każdy ważny przedmiot na grafice powinien być odpowiednio ostry (nie rozmyty).
Pierwszy plan i drugi plan – obiekty pierwszoplanowe i drugoplanowe mogą przeszkadzać i odwracać uwagę od głównej zawartości grafiki. Powinieneś/aś sprawdzić czy obiekt z przodu nie zasłania innych ważnych elementów i czy coś na drugim planie nie rozprasza kompozycji (np. gdy światło latarni nie świeci nad czyjąś głową).
Głównie Jakość – grafiki nominowane powinny mieć dobrą techniczną jakość.
Wartość – naszym głównym celem jest prezentowanie najbardziej wartościowych grafik ze wszystkich dostępnych. Zdjęcia powinny być na swój sposób wyjątkowe, więc bądź tego świadomy/a:
- prawie wszystkie wschody słońca są ładne i większość takich zdjęć nie jest inna w swojej esencji od innych,
- zdjęcia nocy są ładne, ale zasadniczo więcej detali można zobaczyć na zdjęciach zrobionych w czasie dnia.
- piękne nie zawsze musi znaczyć wartościowe.

Nie każda zasada musi być dopasowana, np. grafika może mieć niewielką rozdzielczość, ponieważ wyższa rozdzielczość nie może już być zrobiona (temat zdjęcia już nie żyje lub nie istnieje) lub wydarzenie już nigdy więcej się nie powtórzy.

Wskazówki do oceniania grafik

Istnieje kilka kryteriów dla oceniania grafik.

Z technicznej strony mamy ekspozycję, kompozycję, kontrolę ruchu i głębokość pola.

Ekspozycja odnosi się do zamkniętego diagramu kombinacji, który wykonuje grafikę z stonowaną krzywą, która jest idealnie zdolna do reprezentacji szczegółów cieni i punktów szczytowych w grafice. To nazywamy poziomem. Grafiki mogą być na niskiej stronie stonowanej krzywej (niski zasięg), środkowej (środkowy zasięg) lub wysokiej stronie (wysoki zasięg). Kamery cyfrowe (lub grafiki) mają bardziej skurczony poziom niż film. Brak detalu cienia nie jest koniecznie charakterystyczny dla negatywu. Faktycznie może to być część zaplanowanego efektu. Wypalone szczytowe punkty w dużych częściach rozpraszają element.
Kompozycja odnosi się do uzgodnienia elementów w grafice. ”Zasada Trójpodziału” jest dobrą wskazówką dla kompozycji i jest odziedziczona ze szkoły malarstwa. Ideą tą jest rozdzielenie grafiki z dwiema poziomymi i dwiema pionowymi liniami, w ten sposób dzieląc grafikę w trzecie poziomo i pionowo. Centrowanie tematu jest zawsze uważane za złą praktykę. Tematy zainteresowania są zawsze umieszczone w jednym z ‘’punktów zainteresowania’’, gdzie poziome i pionowe linie przecinają się (cztery takie punkty przecięcia są stworzone). Poziomy nie są nigdy umieszczone w środku, bo ‘’przecinają’’ grafikę na połowę. Są umieszczone albo w górnej lub dolnej poziomej linii. Główną ideą jest nie umieszczanie tematu w centrum.
Kontrola ruchu odnosi się do sposobu, w jaki emocja jest odwzorowana w Grafice. Emocja może być zamrożona lub rozmazana. Przy czym jedna w cale nie jest lepsza od drugiej. To intencja odwzorowania jest ważna. Ruch jest ustosunkowany w obiektach na Grafice. Np. Fotografując samochód wyścigowy, który pojawia się zamrożony w relacji do tła, nie daje nam poczucia prędkości ruchu, a więc technika dyktuje reprezentacje samochodu w zamrożony sposób, ale z zamazanym tłem, aby stworzyć poczucie ruchu, ta technika to ‘’panoramowanie’’. Z drugiej strony zaprezentowanie koszykarza w skoku nie wymaga użycia tej techniki w związku z jego nienaturalną pozycją, co automatycznie sprawia że zdjęcie jest prawidłowe.
Głębia ostrości (DOF – Depth Of Field) odnosi się do części ostrości z przodu i za głównym tematem. Głębia ostrości jest wybrana odnośnie do specyficznych potrzeb każdego zdjęcia. Duża lub mała głębia ostrości może zwiększyć lub podważyć jakość grafiki. Niska głębia ostrości może być użyta dla przyciągnięcia uwagi do głównego tematu, oddzielając go od otoczenia. Wysoka głębia ostrości może być użyta do uwydatnienia przestrzeni. Soczewki krótkoogniskowe (szerokokątne) zapewniają większą głębię ostrości, i odwrotnie, soczewki o długich ogniskowych (teleobiektywy) mają małą głębię ostrości. Najmniejsze przesłony (zasunięte) powiększają głębię i odwrotnie, otwarte zmniejszają ją.

Na elementach graficznych mamy kształt, objętość, kolor, teksturę, perspektywę, równowagę, proporcję itd.

Kształt odnosi się do konturów głównych tematów.
Objętość odnosi się do trójwymiarowej jakości tematu. Jest to osiągane używając światła ze strony (z boku). Przeciwnie do generalnego poglądu, przednie światło nie jest najlepszym światłem. Ono dąży do spłaszczenia tematu. Najlepszym światło dzienne jest wczesnym rankiem lub późnym popołudniem.
Kolor jest ważny. Przesycenie kolorami nie jest dobre.
Tekstura odnosi się do jakości powierzchni tematu. Jest ona wzmagana przez boczne światło… to jest ”wyczucie” dotyku…
Perspektywa odnosi się do ”kąta” towarzyszącego przez linie, które znikają w znikającym punkcie, który może, lecz nie musi być wewnątrz grafiki.
Równowaga odnosi się do porozumienia tematów w grafice, które mogą dać albo równą wagę lub wydawać się cięższe z jednej strony.
Proporcja odnosi się do relacji wielkości tematów w zdjęciu. Generalnie dążymy do reprezentowania małych obiektów, małych w relacjach do innych, ale dobrą techniką jest reprezentowanie małych obiektów przeciwieństw do naturalnych rozmiarów wzajemnego stosunku. Na przykład, mały kwiat skupia większe zastanowienie niż wielka góra…. Nazywamy to odwróceniem skali.

Nie wszystkie elementy muszą być obecne. Niektóre fotografie mogą być osądzone na postawie indywidualnych charakterystyk, np. grafika może być o kolorze lub teksturze, lub kolorze i teksturze, itd.

Symboliczne znaczenie lub powiązanie…. Tu właśnie zaczyna się wojna na opinie…. Złe zdjęcie bardzo trudnego tematu jest lepsze niż zdjęcie dobre zwyczajnego tematu. Dobre zdjęcie trudnego tematu jest nadzwyczajną fotografią.

Grafiki mogą być zrobione kulturowo stronniczo przez fotografującego i/lub obserwatora. Znaczenie grafiki powinno być ocenione zgodnie z kulturalnym kontekstem grafiki, nie przez kulturalny kontekst obserwatora. Grafika „przemawia" do ludzi i ma siłę, aby wywoływać emocje takie jak wrażliwość, wściekłość, odrzucenie, radość, smutek itp. Dobre fotografie nie są ograniczone do wywoływania przyjemnych wrażeń….

Ponad Wszystko bądź kulturalny

Proszę nie zapomnij, że grafika, którą oceniasz, jest czyjąś pracą. Unikaj używania fraz takich jak „to wygląda strasznie” i „nienawidzę tego”. Jeżeli musisz być przeciw - rób to z rozwagą. Pamiętaj także, że twoja znajomość języka może nie być taka sama jak kogoś innego. Dobieraj swoje słowa z uwagą.

Miłego oceniania… i pamiętaj…. wszystkie zasady mogą być złamane.

Spis treści

Kandydatury do przyznania medalu

Odśwież stronę: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates

File:Southworth & Hawes - First etherized operation (re-enactment).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 23:05:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
Info Re-enactment (on July 3rd, 1847) of the first etherized surgery operation on october 16, 1846, in Boston. A stunning and higly cultural photo from the mid 19th century. /// Created by Southworth & Hawes photo studio – originally uploaded by Finavon and then Magnolia677 found the definitive high res. version – nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 23:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 23:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buteo buteo juv Log (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 20:53:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Buteo
Info all by Yerpo
Support -- — Yerpo ^Eh? 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice bokeh Cmao20 (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mailath Castle in Donji Miholjac (3).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 20:48:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Croatia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 22:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont de Comencau (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 20:45:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This works for me in full size. My initial instict was too much path but I think the leading lines are actually really effective here. Good image quality. I like the little splash of red in the upper-left tree. Cmao20 (talk) 22:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freestanding bell tower of Uddevalla Church 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 20:19:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Sweden
Info Right... nicer FPC, new eyes and updated editing program, I think I'll give this try now. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Scenic and sensitive composition Cmao20 (talk) 22:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gongma - Stupa.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 18:50:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- imehling (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting subject and beautiful surroundings Cmao20 (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oliver Mark - Lars von Trier, Copenhagen 2003.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 18:23:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Oliver Mark – uploaded by Oliver Mark – nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 18:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 18:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Poor quality, low educational value. Yann (talk) 18:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, guidelines for quality list 2 mp while here its 5 (if I do the math correctly). The "educational" part is also neither objective, nor based on guidelines. We have photos of white walls featured here. --EUPBR (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the guidelines about FP, and you should nominate it to Quality Pictures before. This is not even a QI. Yann (talk) 19:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Sorry but I fail to see what's so wrong with this that it deserves to be FPX'd. Re. educational value: photograph of a well known film director by a well known German portrait photographer who is sufficiently notable to have an English wikipedia article. Re. poor quality: resolution is not huge but it is adequate for FP (5.7 megapixels). Good sharpness at full size, even the individual hairs on Mr von Trier's beard are visible. I don't really like the choice to cut it out and place it on a white background but that is Herr Mark's artistic choice. I find the optical illusion impressive (I've seen it before but it continues to impress) - and I also appreciate Mark's artistic intention in using a slightly psychedelic, 'trippy' kind of background for a portrait of a director known for his avant-garde, dark, and provocative filmmaking. Overall FP to me. I think this is the first time I've ever contested an FPX but I sincerely think this picture deserves more debate. Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Great Mosque of al-Nuri Feb 2025 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 18:04:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info created by الدبوني – uploaded by الدبوني – nominated by الدبوني -- الدبوني (talk) 18:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- الدبوني (talk) 18:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Poor quality smartphone picture. Yann (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Basilica del Santo, San Marino, Interno, Dettagli floreali - GT 2023.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 13:02:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#San Marino
Info San Marino Co-Cathedral (1838) neo-classical ceilingː A minimalist shot of floral details made by Arch. Antonio Serra - Accademia di Belle Arti di Bologna. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-made detail. (It could do with some more fixing of the green-red CA, though) --Cart (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have reduced CAs, many thanks. Terragio67 (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Здание бывшей городской Думы Углич.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 12:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info Former City Duma in en:Uglich created and uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by FBilula (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A scenic landscape with an interesting building. I love the ducks. Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like how the water leads the viewer to the building. --Cart (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид на ансамбль Ростовского Кремля с озера.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 12:46:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info en:Rostov Veliky Kremlin created and uploaded by FVK36 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 12:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 12:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, extremely dramatic and well composed. Image quality is only okay but the composition makes up for it Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting cloud formation --Llez (talk) 18:49, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The composition is great. Normally you'd think such clouds would be disturbing, but here they actually enhance the compo. However, I think the quality is lacking, with details lost in highlights and halos around the domes. --Cart (talk) 20:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great motive and beautiful composition, but unfortunately it looks oversaturated, overprocessed and rather noisy (and there is no metadata). So reluctantly I have to oppose. --imehling (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morro Jable (Fuerteventura, Spain), Strand -- 2025 -- 2487.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 11:49:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Spain
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:49, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 11:49, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great abstract Cmao20 (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice idea --imehling (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Physics made visible. --Cart (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morro Jable (Fuerteventura, Spain), Strand, Rettungsturm -- 2025 -- 2498.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 11:47:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 11:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Really sorry. Excellent image quality as usual from you but I personally miss an outstanding composition. I am not sure placing the horizon centrally was the right choice, and it feels like the lighthouse tower is a bit lost in the surroundings. Cmao20 (talk) 13:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Beyond the fence there is a really great minimalist photo to be found of just the sand, guard tower, sea and sky. --Cart (talk) 19:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunrise in the Valley of Fire.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 10:05:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Nevada
Info: sunrise is when the Valley of Fire really live up to its name. Second nomination: redeveloped to improve fidelity and cloned sky on top; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Great composition and light but I do think the image quality is borderline Cmao20 (talk) 13:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cmao20.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamm (Westfalen) Hauptbahnhof asv2024-05 img2.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2025 at 09:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info Interior of Hamm (Westfalen) railway station, North Rhine-Westphalia, all by me --A.Savin 09:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful photo that conveys a sense of space and civic grandeur Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cmao20.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you please correct the tilt of the floor at the bottom and also of the ceiling at the top? --Llez (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winzingen vom Messelstein.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2025 at 20:27:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Germany
Info View from the Messelstein to the villages of Winzingen and Wißgoldingen and the mountains Rechberg and Stuifen. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and outstanding detail Cmao20 (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 Terragio67 (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per anderen.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babosas de mar (Chromodoris strigata), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 172.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2025 at 19:09:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Gastropoda
Info Anna's magnificent sea slugs (Chromodoris annae), Anilao, Philippines. This species of nudibranch is found in the central area of the Indo-Pacific region and can reach depths of between 15–30 metres (49–98 ft). It can reach a maximum size of 5 centimetres (2.0 in) length. Its diet consists only of Petrosaspongia sp., a group of sponge, due to its noxious chemical composition. It's able to absorb this compound and store it in glands that stretch around the mantle. These stored chemicals are unpleasant to some surrounding fish, allowing Chromodoris annae to avoid predation. Note: we have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive Cmao20 (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Psychedelic underwater creatures. Good quality picture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support World of wonders. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cute little slugs. --Cart (talk) 19:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apple Marina Bay Sands, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-16, DD 105-107 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2025 at 19:01:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
Info Apple Marina Bay Sands, Marina Bay, Singapore. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - great atmosphere - Je-str (talk) 20:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 21:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Futuristic sphere, compelling composition with the luminous purple fountains, enlightening the context -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:California Scrub-jay with broken bill (52553719274).jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2025 at 19:15:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info California Scrub-jay with broken bill, Contra Costa County, California. Сreated by Becky Matsubara – uploaded/nominated by Юрий Д.К 19:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 19:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It might be difficult to catch preys with such an impediment. Good quality image -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Self-portrait of Abraham Bogardus.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2025 at 14:54:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1870-1879
Info created by Abraham Bogardus - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info That's a fascimile of his signature, which seemed sufficient reason to include it, since the photo is primarily used on pages about him. We could do a cropped version, I suppose, but generally we promote the least cropped version. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since I know that if I don't do it, there's every chance someone else is going to, and possibly upload over, I've uploaded a cropped version as well. I don't think the crop is as useful for most uses: This is a self-portrait, after all, so the frame is Bogardus's creation, or at least artistic decision - but I think it's often better to not leave it to others to make. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photograph (imagine how difficult it was then to take a self-portrait photograph which was sharp on the front eye), nice frame and signature, excellent restoration. – Aristeas (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Ratekreel (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas, well done as depicted. Terragio67 (talk) 13:39, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support And thank you for providing a crop. Like you say, it is inevitable, so it might just as well be done by someone who knows how to do it, and how to make the correct links on the file pages. --Cart (talk) 19:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merops apiaster pair (Hungary).jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2025 at 21:33:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
Info Merops apiaster (bee-eaters) pair in Hungary. Сreated by Andy Morffew – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К 21:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 21:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice scene. Have taken the liberty to refine the gallery link: we have a subsection for the Bee-eaters, so we should use that one for the gallery link. – Aristeas (talk) 17:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting action, excellent angle of view, nice background and good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 12:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support and wow. Terragio67 (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Bonifatius, Wiesbaden, Choir 20200613 6.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2025 at 12:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by DXR – uploaded by DXR – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality, beautiful lighting and atmosphere, and in this case even the chairs do not irritate, but contribute to the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - the unusual arrangement of chairs was actually what drew me particularly to this one amongst DXR's photos of this church. Cmao20 (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Mittendrin, statt nur dabei ;-) !!! - per Aristeas - Je-str (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Suisse - CGN 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2025 at 11:31:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info "La Suisse", built 1910 by Sulzer Ltd. Winterthur, is the largest "Belle Epoque"-side-wheel-steamer on the Lake Geneva; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A refreshing perspective with adds a dramatic touch by giving the impression that the steamer will soon run over the viewer. ;–) Beautiful light and colours. Question to native speakers of English: is this a boat or a ship, i.e. should it be sorted into the gallery section for FPs of boats or into the section for ships? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 17:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aristeas, not a native English speaker, but I speak "water vessel". These kind of vessels are called Riverboats or Tour boats in English, so that will make it a boat and not a ship. People sometimes get confused by the designation "SS" in front of the name of similar boats, but that doesn't mean "steam ship", see the article Steamship. --Cart (talk) 09:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Cart. Thus I have changed the section anchor in the gallery link from #Ships to #Boats. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the correction --Llez (talk) 11:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like the photographer better get out of the way. --Milseburg (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I would like to see it more sharper, but anyway I like all other things here. --Rbrechko (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support: per Rbrechko. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:51, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another brick in the lake... Terragio67 (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The nautical equivalent of a lowrider. --Cart (talk) 19:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:NXP PCF8577C LCD driver with I²C (Colour Corrected).jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2025 at 09:42:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created by Cole L., uploaded by Kroger4, nominated by Yann
Info LCD direct/duplex driver with an onboard I²C-bus interface made by NXP Semiconductors.
Support -- Yann (talk) 09:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't look sufficiently sharp to me.--Peulle (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Peulle: Please take into account the size of the device and the resolution. Yann (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support A small component in high magnification --Llez (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's an impressive view of something that's only a few square mm, but the post processing isn't all there, with a light gradient going from green to purple over the surface. Also, the black border is not doing the image any favors, even if it is just background. Can be fixed though. --Cart (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue-gray tanager (03108)2.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2025 at 23:22:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Thraupidae_(Tanagers_and_Allies)
Info Blue-gray tanager (Thraupid episcopus) on ornamental banana. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:22, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:22, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 02:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:24, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:27, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and good quality given the size of the bird -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Cool. Terragio67 (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, but could you perhaps check the parameters for CA removal on this. You got some of those telltale gray rectangles, especially where the wing meets the body. They are a bane for blue objects where shadows are crossing into the violet spectrum. Cart (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haigerloch - Altstadt - Schloss - Ansicht von SSW (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2025 at 17:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info Haigerloch, Germany: view of Haigerloch Castle and its castle church with the surrounding valley, seen from south-south-west from the Oberstadtstraße. The current form of the castle was built around 1662 by architect Michael Beer for Count of Hohenzollern-Haigerloch, and expanded in 1745–48. All by Aristeas (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like that we see the castle and its church at eye level over the valley. The photo was taken through the only usable opening in a hedge, so I could not avoid the foreground leaves at the left, bottom, and right; but IMHO it’s nice how they conceal the buildings in the valley and hence emphasize the castle. -- Aristeas (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support was on my list Cmao20 (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good --A.Savin 18:30, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing colours. BigDom (talk) 06:43, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 21:37, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great view, almost as good as a drone, and the camera delivers exceptional image quality. Special complex of buildings -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Je-str (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fragment of 160 Front Street West, Toronto.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2025 at 16:34:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info Facade detail of the TD Terrace scyscraper, 160 Front Street West, Toronto, designed by Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture, completed in 2024. Photograph created and uploaded by Maksim Sokolov, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ It’s a matter of taste, but personally I would regard the TD Terrace skyscraper as rather ugly and boring. But I love this detail of its glass façade. The photographer has found a perspective from which the lower corner appears as a perfect continuous curve, like the graph of a mathematical function, resulting in a beautiful minimalist composition. – Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you voted twice. Yann (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:40, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting detail, thanks for nominating it --Kritzolina (talk) 19:30, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed. BigDom (talk) 06:43, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose As much as I love abstract architectural photos, this one lacks the relationship between light and shadows that define the 3d form, which is to say it lacks the wow Henrysz (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition integrating this line from the lower left corner to the upper right corner is very successful. Beautiful architectural capture revealing a visually interesting rhythm -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Careening of a pirogue on a sandy beach of a tiny island in the Mekong near Don Det in Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2025 at 02:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something new Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. Good choice for the duration of the long exposure: the river looks soft like silk, but still like a river – sometimes people exaggerate the long exposure, making the water appear too soft and unnatural. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sydney Sweeney 2019 by Glenn Francis.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 18:41:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info American actress Sydney Sweeney at the Once Upon A Time In Hollywood premiere on July 22, 2019 in Hollywood, California. Created and uploaded by Toglenn– nominated by Redmyname31 -- ツredmyname ^💬 18:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ツredmyname ^💬 18:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Composition is a bit tight (top and bottom), but good focus and depth of field. Nice portrait of a famous actress -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a fine shot.--Peulle (talk) 07:58, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:12, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose completely artificial looking, not appealing in any way --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hem, a small part of the background right over her head is looking strange, like retouched. This could be a hint that the background or a part of it has been exchanged, contributing to the artificial look mentioned by Kritzolina. – Aristeas (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I have to correct myself. When we compare other photos from the same event which show indentical background colours (e.g. 1, 2), it seems the photographer has just removed the black border between the colours because here it appeared right behind Sweeney’s head which was certainly irritating. So the background is mostly authentic. I guess it’s the almost symmetric arrangement and the front-heavy lighting which give the artificial impression. It’s the same with similar portraits from the same event (e.g.), while the more casual shots (e.g.) look natural. – Aristeas (talk) 21:00, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Quality is good but when I compare it to this recent nomination, the other picture, while also obviously in a glamorous publicity setting, feels more candid and spontaneous. This one feels staged and artificial by comparison. So, mainly agree with Kritzolina. Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I find the look slightly creepy and the sloppy removal of elements at the top is a no-go. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a fan of the background.--الدبوني (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't envy these actors who are under contract to get this dolled up and stand there smiling at every promotion of a movie. These events very seldom makes for good portrait photos, and this is one example of it. The photo doesn't do her justice. --Cart (talk) 19:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leopard on mount in Tsavo East National Park.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 15:01:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info I've hesitated about this one because of the blurry foreground but what a great composition, expression, and image quality. created by Byrdyak – uploaded by Byrdyak – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:19, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ----IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:11, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with the nominator that the blurry foreground is distracting, and I also regret that the feet and the tail are hidden, however it's a good quality picture, and nice posture of a "not-so-easy-to-take" wild subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:13, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Ratekreel (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capela dos Ossos 2024-12-22.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 14:18:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info ...memento mori... All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Super high resolution and very interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Blurry at full size but acceptable level of detail at lower resolution. The uneven light / shadow is not very successful, nevertheless the subject is in my view extraordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:47, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 21:37, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Здание машинной школы Балтийского флота.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 14:18:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Russia
Info: Art Nouveau exterior of the Baltic Fleet's Machine School building. I feel that the bleak winter light complements and accentuates the state of decay of this once spectacular building. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp and the sky has strange colors. Also very obvious chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination: indeed, it needs to be reprocessed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 09:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Triangle of Everything.png

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 12:27:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Science#Astronomy
Info created and uploaded by Avsa, nominated by Yann
Info The Triangle of Everything is a log-log chart of everything that has existed since the Big Bang or could ever have existed. All existing objects are bound by three lines: the Compton Limit, the Schwarzschild radius, and the Hubble radius. The vertices are the Big Bang on the right, the Observable universe on the top left, and the heat death of the universe / true vacuum / zero-point energy universe on the bottom left.
Support Well made graphics with a lot of useful information. This is more than #Astronomy, so may be it should be in #Science. -- Yann (talk) 12:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info For the record, this nomination unanimously fails on Wikipedia (1-5): en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Triangle of Everything.png -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For 2 reasons: 1) Visually, you can't read the texts written in small size, unless it's displayed huge like a poster. 2) Too much of "everything / anything", that is obviously too complex, specific and cluttered, with unnecessary curved arrows, ellipses, or asterisks in captions saying "Asterisk means still hypothetical", etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 21:35, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sur En-Sent. Skulptur- Futurchild - 2021. Kunstler- Andreas Hofer. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 05:23:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info Sur En/Sent, municipality of Scuol, kanton Graubünden. Sculpture Futurchild - 2021. Artwork by Andreas Hofer künstler, Davos, Switzerland is trying to connect art and nature in public outdoor spaces. This sculpture stands with many others along a mountain path near Sur En in the canton of Graubünden.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To me the light feels ordinary, and makes the scene appear flat. And, the background is busy and just as in focus as the subject, which is distracting. Though I couldn't produce a better result in the same setting. Henrysz (talk) 04:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support: oddly appealing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The white balance feels a bit warm to me but nevertheless interesting and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment and support. The photo was taken in October with autumn colors. But I can make the colors a little less warm.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question Are these flashy sportswear pieces part of the artist's original work? It's possible but I tried to find some information about this sculptor on Google, and didn't find much other than this and this, where no evidence is given that this artist dresses his works of art. As here for the sculpture Het Lieverdje by Carel Kneulman in Amsterdam, compared to the original. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:46, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: I assume so, it certainly looked authentic. It never occurred to me that it wasn't meant to be that way. If this had been an inappropriate joke, I think the clothes would have been removed long ago because the artworks were viewed regularly. I also scanned the information on the sculpture with my phone and you also saw photos of a dressed boy.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer. Sorry, the gray shorts, full of dirty stains, spoil the artwork in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:12, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goldene-Madonna-Essen.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 02:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden Madonna of Essen part of the Essen Cathedral Treasury, Dated around the year 980, it is both the oldest known sculpture of the Madonna and the oldest free-standing medieval sculpture north of the Alps

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Jewellery
Info Golden Madonna of Essen part of the Essen Cathedral Treasury, Dated around the year 980, it is both the oldest known sculpture of the Madonna and the oldest free-standing medieval sculpture north of the Alps; technique: Focus stack, Hand-Held

Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:51, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 11:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two bees absorbing pollen from an Iceland poppy in the flower garden of Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 02:26:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)
Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:16, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful and poetic. We are a little bit spoilt by the wonderful focus-stacked images of flowers, but IMHO there is still room for classic one-shot photographs like this one. It’s sharp where it matters, and the soft transition from sharp to unsharp gives it a delicate quality which is very appropriate for this subject and which I sometimes miss in the focus-stacked images. – Aristeas (talk) 14:33, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karolingisches-Evangeliar-800-Domschatz-Essen.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 02:17:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Large Carolingian Gospel Book from around 800 in the Essen Cathedral Treasury, opening page to the Gospel of Mark

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Books
Info Large Carolingian Gospel Book from around 800 in the Essen Cathedral Treasury, opening page to the Gospel of Mark, technique: Focus stacked, hand-held
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating! Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Important illuminated manuscript, good quality considering the difficult circumstances. – Aristeas (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:50, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done. Terragio67 (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Books

File:73-250-0001 Khotyn Fortress RB 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2025 at 19:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:47, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose can't say I'm fond of the lighting. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent overview of the different parts of the fortress and of its situation. – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary Katowice (50104).jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2025 at 20:41:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
Info The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Katowice, Poland. Shame about the construction on the left, but I like the light and detail. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 12:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kind of a cluttered street but I am sure this is the best feasible view of the facade of this church and I also like the light Cmao20 (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Rbrechko (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light makes the church façade stand out from the cluttered street. – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Národní Muzeum.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 21:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Czech Republic
Info created by Theklan – uploaded by Theklan – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Theklan (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but maybe the middle section is a bit on the dark side.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:09, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jezioro Dobskie (Doben See).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 11:00:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate composition with the predominant shadow, and the boat is a bit overexposed. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good enought for me Юрий Д.К 12:02, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, have been going back and forth on this one but the composition doesn't work for me. Instead of adding to the photo, it feels like the reeds just obscure a more interesting composition. Also quite small for FP in 2025. Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tabela czasu

Thu 23 Jan → Fri 7 Feb
Fri 24 Jan → Sat 8 Feb
Sat 25 Jan → Sun 9 Feb
Sun 26 Jan → Mon 10 Feb
Mon 27 Jan → Tue 11 Feb
Tue 28 Jan → Wed 12 Feb
Wed 29 Jan → Thu 13 Feb
Thu 30 Jan → Fri 14 Feb
Fri 31 Jan → Sat 15 Feb
Sat 1 Feb → Sun 16 Feb
Sun 2 Feb → Mon 17 Feb
Mon 3 Feb → Tue 18 Feb
Tue 4 Feb → Wed 19 Feb
Wed 5 Feb → Thu 20 Feb
Thu 6 Feb → Fri 21 Feb
Fri 7 Feb → Sat 22 Feb